gender gap/ exam results

[rebelraising]

Every year, I get all confused about the gender gap in exam results. On the one hand, I want to be dismissive, because, despite the fact that girls do so much better, men still get paid more, and there does seem to be less attention paid to that. So, really, every time girls do better, whatever they're doing better at suddenly counts for nothing.

On the other hand, it's very bad that there is an education system that seems to systematically exclude boys from high achievement. Gender equality is gender equality.

Anyway, when they set up these scheme to "tackle boys' under-achievement", if they don't also set up schemes to "tackle" the fact that girls still get worse grades in maths and physics, we'll know exactly where the government is coming from.

Comments

[dolores.livejournal.com]

The 11-plus is still very much alive in all of Kent, thanks to the Tory fuckers that have run the county council down here since the year dot. Unlikely to be going anytime soon either (this is after all the county which decided to pass its own section 28 when they thought that the Government might repeal the old one in England). The system is quite nasty, and encourages a lovely culture of the comprehensive kids thinking they're the thick ones (making it very difficult to motivate them in the schools) and the grammar schools (as an institution if not the pupils) being very much up themselves. Also much trauma in families where one sibling goes to grammar and the other doesn't.

And then we have all the Catholic, CofE, and Methodist schools too...

[andypop.livejournal.com]

I remember my distress when my best friend went to the 'Secondary Modern' and I went to 'Grammar' (fucking bizarre names for these institutions!). Especially when I realised I was stuck in a school with too many people who might've been better at IQ tests, but otherwise couldn't lick a stamp without being shown how.